Religion and Ethics Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Rhiannon on October 28, 2015, 06:20:23 PM

Title: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Rhiannon on October 28, 2015, 06:20:23 PM
This genuinely is appalling.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34647454
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: 2Corrie on October 28, 2015, 06:30:32 PM
That should be illegal
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Nearly Sane on October 28, 2015, 06:31:44 PM
What phlegmbuckets we are!
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Nearly Sane on October 28, 2015, 06:32:53 PM
Difficult to make it illegal. Rather might legislate to have such rejections impounded and used by state.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Red Giant on October 28, 2015, 07:18:00 PM
Reminds me of a TV documentary ages ago.  The man from Tesco was talking about what the customer demands.  Then the shopper says "That's rubbish.  I don't demand anything.  I just look at what's on the shelf, and if I don't like the look of it, I just don't buy it."

Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Udayana on October 28, 2015, 07:47:45 PM

 http://www.unep.org/wed/2013/quickfacts/

 Roughly one third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year — approximately 1.3 billion tonnes — gets lost or wasted.

Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Bubbles on October 29, 2015, 07:11:18 AM
It all needs to be redirected to the food banks and handed out to people in need.

IMO anyway.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: floo on October 29, 2015, 08:33:17 AM
That is disgusting, people in this world are starving! >:(
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: OH MY WORLD! on October 29, 2015, 10:14:05 AM
And somebody was calling American society sick. Good grief!
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Udayana on October 29, 2015, 10:20:52 AM
Why is it that the discount supermarkets like Aldi or Lidl or alternatively the the co-ops don't set up deals with the farmers to buy ordinary veg - the farmers could demand more from Tesco and Waitrose for the "perfect" looking ones, but supply normal veg to everyone else? Or just take them to market?

It all looks like a scheme to fix prices ... for all I know.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Rhiannon on October 29, 2015, 10:37:51 AM
A lot of it could go into frozen or pre- prepared foods.

I knew some salad farmers a while back who had their salad crops rejected by Waitrose. It nearly bankrupted them. To be fair I've noticed Tesco selling less than perfect root veg in its 'value' range this year.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Harrowby Hall on October 29, 2015, 01:16:30 PM
This genuinely is appalling.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34647454

Indeed.

However, what really disquiets me about this article is that the supermarket concerned for rejection of this produce is not identified.

My observation of parsnips - in Tesco and Morrisons, the supermarkets I use most - is that perfection of shape is not an important factor in produce reaching the shelf.

So, which is the company that is reported to have rejected so much of the farmer's output? And why does he appear to be prepared to accept that judgement? Can he not find an alternative purchaser? Is he tied into a contract that forbids him from selling rejected produce to another purchaser?
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Free Willy on October 29, 2015, 01:35:18 PM
This genuinely is appalling.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34647454

Indeed.

However, what really disquiets me about this article is that the supermarket concerned for rejection of this produce is not identified.

My observation of parsnips - in Tesco and Morrisons, the supermarkets I use most - is that perfection of shape is not an important factor in produce reaching the shelf.

So, which is the company that is reported to have rejected so much of the farmer's output? And why does he appear to be prepared to accept that judgement? Can he not find an alternative purchaser? Is he tied into a contract that forbids him from selling rejected produce to another purchaser?
This is why we need a kind of Attlee style socialism to set up boards and nationalisation to bring some sort of control into these matters. Nanny needs to intervene a bit since the market has gone a bit naughty.

We could then follow it up with a bit of Butskellism.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Hope on October 29, 2015, 06:57:11 PM
This is why we need a kind of Attlee style socialism to set up boards and nationalisation to bring some sort of control into these matters. Nanny needs to intervene a bit since the market has gone a bit naughty.

We could then follow it up with a bit of Butskellism.
Notsure whether this is a case in point, but the EU has set out some truly strange rulings re. colours, shapes and even sizes of fruit and veg.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: jeremyp on October 29, 2015, 08:20:50 PM
[However, what really disquiets me about this article is that the supermarket concerned for rejection of this produce is not identified.
They all do it.

Quote
So, which is the company that is reported to have rejected so much of the farmer's output? And why does he appear to be prepared to accept that judgement? Can he not find an alternative purchaser? Is he tied into a contract that forbids him from selling rejected produce to another purchaser?
I imagine that farmers operate on very tight margins. If the supermarket rejects a lorry load of your veg, it needs to be transported to wherever else you are going to sell them. That costs money.

Not only that, the supermarkets are the only customers that take veg in such large quantities. Where else are you going to sell an enormous truckload of produce. You might say "schools and hospitals" but I think, if you look into it, they probably already have a source for all the vegetables that they need.

If you think about it, this wastage is a symptom of the fact that we are overproducing. If people wanted to buy all those rejected vegetables, they would be on the shelves.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Sriram on October 30, 2015, 05:56:07 AM


Why can't they have separate stores to sell these 'lesser' veggies at lower prices... or even distribute them free?!  I am sure lots of poor people could do with some help. They could even transport the veggies to other EU countries where the influx of migrants is more.   

 
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Leonard James on October 30, 2015, 06:45:45 AM


Why can't they have separate stores to sell these 'lesser' veggies at lower prices... or even distribute them free?!  I am sure lots of poor people could do with some help. They could even transport the veggies to other EU countries where the influx of migrants is more.

You are forgetting the basis of the capitalist system :- Mammon rules!
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Udayana on October 30, 2015, 08:42:46 AM
... But even Mammon needs to be restrained when he is having tantrum or a fit!
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Leonard James on October 30, 2015, 09:26:41 AM
... But even Mammon needs to be restrained when he is having tantrum or a fit!

Good luck with that, mate!  :)
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Gonnagle on October 30, 2015, 10:57:37 AM
Dear Leonard,

Your mention of Mammon got me Googling. :o :o

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/nov/25/worshipping-money-new-faith-sweeping-england



Gonnagle.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Leonard James on October 30, 2015, 11:21:02 AM
Dear Leonard,

Your mention of Mammon got me Googling. :o :o

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/nov/25/worshipping-money-new-faith-sweeping-england



Gonnagle.

All we have to combat the monster is our social instinct, but I fear it will never supplant the selfish one.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Gonnagle on October 30, 2015, 11:30:00 AM
Dear Leonard,

Is social instinct the same as herd instinct?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/social+instinct

Gonnagle.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Leonard James on October 30, 2015, 12:10:01 PM
Dear Leonard,

Is social instinct the same as herd instinct?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/social+instinct

Gonnagle.
Not in my book. The social instinct puts the good of the group before the selfish instinct, although it tends to get overridden when the chips are down.  :(
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Rhiannon on November 01, 2015, 09:57:52 AM
[However, what really disquiets me about this article is that the supermarket concerned for rejection of this produce is not identified.
They all do it.

Quote
So, which is the company that is reported to have rejected so much of the farmer's output? And why does he appear to be prepared to accept that judgement? Can he not find an alternative purchaser? Is he tied into a contract that forbids him from selling rejected produce to another purchaser?
I imagine that farmers operate on very tight margins. If the supermarket rejects a lorry load of your veg, it needs to be transported to wherever else you are going to sell them. That costs money.

Not only that, the supermarkets are the only customers that take veg in such large quantities. Where else are you going to sell an enormous truckload of produce. You might say "schools and hospitals" but I think, if you look into it, they probably already have a source for all the vegetables that they need.

If you think about it, this wastage is a symptom of the fact that we are overproducing. If people wanted to buy all those rejected vegetables, they would be on the shelves.

Supermarkets deliberately sign contracts meaning we overproduce. This means they can play farmers against each other and manipulate prices in their favour.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Udayana on November 02, 2015, 10:35:06 PM
HFW's programme was just on, and was it right-on or what!

Morrisons was the supermarket causing the parsnip waste in this case, and may be the cause, directly or not, of the Hammond's business shutting down.

Actually, I'm beginning to understand that, essentially, this country is packed with waste-criminals, lard-arsed, greedy and brainless. Drastic action needs to be taken. People have more money than sense.

Slash tax-credits, scrap the "living wage", pile on the taxes on businesses, rigorously enforce every regulation and tax principle.  Boycott the supermarkets and American companies. Check all dustbins, impose drastic punishment for those not recycling properly or just wasting essentials.

We should have a committee checking all contracts and declaring all those that are unfair or anti-social, null and void. Set up the guillotines whilst we are at it.
 
5p plastic bag charge? -- puuuhhh!!!



Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Udayana on November 02, 2015, 11:48:40 PM
oops ... might be a bit of an over-reaction there :)
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Rhiannon on November 03, 2015, 10:06:03 AM
Poor old HFW does manage to irritate people.

Mind you, Jamie Oliver does the same. He once called vegetarians 'faddy'; now he's championing eating vegan because it's generating him money from the weight loss camp. And apparently me I'm a 'moron ' for letting my kids eat the odd packet of crisps.
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: trippymonkey on November 03, 2015, 03:19:50 PM
Agreed but.....
How would you qualify a rather 'odd' packet of crisps ???? LOL
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Rhiannon on November 03, 2015, 03:52:17 PM
Prawn cocktail. Wtf is that about?
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Udayana on November 03, 2015, 04:38:41 PM
Asda today had "regulated" looking packed parsnips and loose parsnips that looked quite variable, long or fat, or bits broken off. Bought one to have in this evenings dinner - 23p (!).
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Rhiannon on November 03, 2015, 04:44:37 PM
What are you making?
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Udayana on November 03, 2015, 08:01:39 PM
Oh we just had a mix of roast and lightly fired veg with cheese...
Title: Re: Parsnip shocker
Post by: Rhiannon on November 03, 2015, 10:26:00 PM
That sounds nice. Apart from toadying them in in honey for my dad at Christmas I only ever use parsnips in the odd casserole .