Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Keith Maitland on December 01, 2015, 11:25:36 PM
-
Professor Boutwell writes:
"I want you to consider the possibility that your parents did not shape you as a person. Despite how it feels, your mother and father (or whoever raised you) likely imprinted almost nothing on your personality that has persisted into adulthood. Pause for a minute and let that heresy wash across your synapses. It flies in the face of common sense, does it not? In fact, it’s the type of claim that is unwise to make unless you have some compelling evidence to back it up. Even then it will elicit the ire of many. Psychologists especially get touchy about this subject. I do have evidence, though, and by the time we’ve strolled through the menagerie of reasons to doubt parenting effects, I think another point will also become evident: the problems with parenting research are just a symptom of a larger malady plaguing the social and health sciences. A malady that needs to be dealt with"
[....]
"The socialization of children certainly matters (remember, neither personality nor temperament is 100 percent heritable), but it is not the parents who are the primary “socializers”, that honor goes to the child’s peer group (a fascinating topic, but one that merits its own separate discussion)"
http://quillette.com/2015/12/01/why-parenting-may-not-matter-and-why-most-social-science-research-is-probably-wrong/
-
Make sure you clean your socks, Keith.
-
I'll have a read of the article tomorrow. It's a big claim, not self-evidently wrong, and like all such big claims, stands in need of a lot of quality evidence. Interesting topic, though, whoever has the right of it.