Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => Politics & Current Affairs => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on August 10, 2017, 09:22:31 AM
-
Or indeed is paying informants right?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-40883507
-
On balance, I would say yes.
-
Yes.
Northumbria Police's Steve Ashman said the information provided by the man led to the conviction of 17 men and a woman for abusing girls in Newcastle.
And that's why.
-
IF paying said informant resulted in harm being prevented - yes. I can imagine this was never going to be an easy sell - it was always going to be a case of damned if you do or damned if you don't.
-
I too think yes, it was the better choice to make. I hope that the guilty men and the woman will receive strong jail sentences and be supervised afterwards.
-
On balance.....Yes.
I am going to start a new topic related to this on the General board. Seeya there.
-
I think it's risky - the man is a liar, as the article says. But in this case it also got results.
-
Yes I think it was right albeit regrettable. Police often do deals with convicted criminals to get a big result, in this case it worked.
-
It goes against the grain for a paedophile to be paid to help the police, but needs must I suppose.
-
Case of the ends justify the means I suppose.
He was not in prison, had served his time& we don't know anything about him. Maybe just as well.
Police do sometimes go into prisons and do deals with people doing time in order to prevent further crimes.
-
Read this lunch time:=
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4218461/paedophile-grooming-gang-northumbria-police-newcastle/
-
Or indeed is paying informants right?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-40883507
It got the results and it saved the children from further abuse... is £10,000 worth that? Most definitely.
-
It got the results and it saved the children from further abuse... is £10,000 worth that? Most definitely.
I completely agree.