Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment => Topic started by: Anchorman on February 12, 2019, 10:25:59 PM
-
Just watched Paxman's second part of his exposee on the royal children - and Paxman was incisive as ever. Both episodes were worth a watch, tonights's especially so. https://www.radiotimes.com/tv-programme/e/hpcsbv/paxman-on-the-queens-children--s1-e2-paxman-on-the-queens-children/
-
Just watched Paxman's second part of his exposee on the royal children - and Paxman was incisive as ever. Both episodes were worth a watch, tonights's especially so. https://www.radiotimes.com/tv-programme/e/hpcsbv/paxman-on-the-queens-children--s1-e2-paxman-on-the-queens-children/
Is it actually good or does it just pander to your prejudices?
-
Is it actually good or does it just pander to your prejudices?
Well, in the first two sentences of part one, Paxman declared himself, on balance, a monarchist.
Does that answer your question?
-
I missed the second episode, saw the first one which didn't tell us anything much new but was quite good. I'll look for second episode soon.
If anyone wants the 'real thing', watch 'The Crown' on Netflix. So far two series but another one will be broadcast this year. Good stuff and very well cast. Ch5, I'd forgotten what it was on.