Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => Politics & Current Affairs => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on May 20, 2023, 05:22:45 PM
-
Should be an immediate sacking - who knows how long this one would last
https://archive.vn/gWWJI
-
Should be an immediate sacking - who knows how long this one would last
https://archive.vn/gWWJI
Sorry, don't understand the second part of your sentence. How long what would last?
-
Sorry, don't understand the second part of your sentence. How long what would last?
This sacking, if she is, of Braverman
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63825127
-
This sacking, if she is, of Braverman
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63825127
It'd take a braverman than me to hazard a guess.
-
This sacking, if she is, of Braverman
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63825127
Ah, that makes sense. She really shouldn't have been re-employed after the first one. She's not competent to be a government minister.
-
I have very little regard for Braverman but this is a piece of nonsense, and pursuing it is counterproductive
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/suella-braverman-rwanda-ministerial-code-b2343646.html
-
...
-
There will be no inquiry.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65694017
-
Meanwhile others claim for their fines
https://news.sky.com/story/four-mps-claimed-driving-fines-on-expenses-and-now-have-to-pay-the-money-back-12891419