Religion and Ethics Forum

General Category => Politics & Current Affairs => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on September 11, 2023, 12:47:31 PM

Title: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: Nearly Sane on September 11, 2023, 12:47:31 PM
We need a host of Barbara Wodehouses!


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66770328
Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: SqueakyVoice on September 12, 2023, 05:35:46 PM
We need a host of Barbara Wodehouses!


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66770328 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66770328)
Quote
"These dogs aren't cared for by the breeders, they just want money, so from the greed at the start, irresponsible ownership in the middle, " ..."Barry Gardiner, Labour MP and member of theCommon's Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA), told BBC News he did not think it was right to ban the breed, saying it was about controlling owners."
(From the article)I think I'd agree with both arguments. I saw one dog while shopping at lunch time. It was held by a lead and its owner kept it there. It was very calm ( and no one went near it) and quite inquisitive.
Blame the irresponsible owners and any irresponsible  owners.
Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: Nearly Sane on September 13, 2023, 11:59:44 AM
(From the article)I think I'd agree with both arguments. I saw one dog while shopping at lunch time. It was held by a lead and its owner kept it there. It was very calm ( and no one went near it) and quite inquisitive.
Blame the irresponsible owners and any irresponsible  owners.
Agree, and someone been arrested for it


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-66256193
Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: Nearly Sane on September 15, 2023, 12:27:34 PM
I see Sunak has announced that Bully XL dogs will be banned by the end of the year even though there isn't a definition and the ban is in part because of the death reported here where we don't know what the dogs were.

Knee jerk politics but that's really the entirety of Sunak's political ambitions at the moment.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-66817795


Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: SqueakyVoice on September 15, 2023, 07:57:00 PM

Knee jerk politics but that's really the entirety of Sunak's political ambitions at the moment.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991)
Quote
author =wiki 
The Act has been controversial for failing to stem the rise of dog attacks and for focusing on a dog's breed or looks instead of an individual dog's behaviour.

If it was up to me, I'd castrate them.
 
 The owners.

 Not the dogs.
Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: Nearly Sane on September 15, 2023, 08:36:06 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991)
If it was up to me, I'd castrate them.
 
 The owners.

 Not the dogs.


https://youtu.be/04clpd7h0b0?si=ESdmpLu-xY1eYWYC
Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: Nearly Sane on September 16, 2023, 09:52:21 PM
Starmer making sure Sunak doesn't out knee jerk him


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66829892
Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: Nearly Sane on January 11, 2024, 04:57:24 PM

SNP now going to follow the lead of Westminster, and by doing so piss off everyone.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-67948509
Title: Re: The return of 'devil dogs'
Post by: Nearly Sane on January 13, 2024, 12:48:33 PM
And in Northern Ireland? Well, it's complicated.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-67959845