Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: SqueakyVoice on January 28, 2024, 03:04:44 PM
-
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/jan/16/andrew-scott-is-right-its-time-to-retire-the-phrase-openly-gay
“I’m going to make a pitch for getting rid of the phrase ‘openly gay,’” said Scott, ... “It’s an expression that you only ever hear in the media. You’re never at a party and you say, ‘This is my openly gay friend…’” Why, he wondered, is “openly” always attached to that adjective?
Thoughts anyone?
I can think of two examples, but I don't think either is illuminating:
1 Homer Simpson finds a friend who does say he's gay. Homer gets annoyed that while he is gay, he isn't 'flamingly gay'.
2 In Big Boys (new series) one is trying to find out if one of his lecturers is straight or gay (I suspect the end of that episode /might/ be closer to the mark).
-
I would suggest a better comparison with Schofield because of the timing is Prince Andrew.
But yes, the 'openly gay' phrase seems ready to be be retired.
-
Good article until the last two words. How I hate that "Yaass" nonsense.