Author Topic: Scrap FPTP  (Read 536 times)

SqueakyVoice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
  • from God, "We apologise for the inconvenience."
Scrap FPTP
« on: September 22, 2022, 08:51:59 AM »
https://liveapp.inews.co.uk/2022/09/22/more-britons-want-to-scrap-first-past-the-post-elections-than-keep-the-status-quo/content.html
(The article is more nuanced than the headline.)

Quote
It is the first time more people (51%) have backed PR than first-past-the-post since the British Social Attitudes survey launched in 1983.


It still reads a bit like a binary choice, but at least it seems to be growing in the right direction.

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: Scrap FPTP
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2022, 10:50:53 AM »
FPTP must go, but we must be careful what we replace it with: the list system is absolutely disastrous, more or less guaranteeing any party that puts up candidates at least one MP, so extreme, unrepresentative parties end up holding the balance of power. It also means that no-one has an MP of their own. Israel uses it, with disastrous results. Additional member is a crude cobbling together of fptp, which we want to get rid of, and the list, which is, as i say, even worse than fptp. What we need is single transferable vote.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Scrap FPTP
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2022, 11:46:52 AM »
FPTP must go, but we must be careful what we replace it with: the list system is absolutely disastrous, more or less guaranteeing any party that puts up candidates at least one MP, so extreme, unrepresentative parties end up holding the balance of power. It also means that no-one has an MP of their own. Israel uses it, with disastrous results. Additional member is a crude cobbling together of fptp, which we want to get rid of, and the list, which is, as i say, even worse than fptp. What we need is single transferable vote.

Well how about a proportionally represented chamber to replace the Commons and an FPTP system to replace the Lords. The Commons would still generate most of the legislation but the Lords replacement would concentrate on representing their constituents. I would decouple the election of the new Lords people from general elections so that they don't have to follow the party line all the time. There would also have to be some accountability of the government to the New Lords and many other details that need to be worked out but, as a broad idea, I think it would work.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Udayana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5478
  • βε ηερε νοω
    • The Byrds - My Back Pages
Re: Scrap FPTP
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2022, 02:55:09 PM »
Everyone can put forward their favourite system or, at least, the one that makes more sense to them.

However, if the choice of system is left to those who have been elected by the previous system, they can't help but introduce an unacceptable bias. Under Cameron, even though Clegg had obtained a referendum, no one really wanted the proposed AV system.

Ah, but I was so much older then ... I'm younger than that now