Author Topic: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig  (Read 351 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65852
Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« on: July 15, 2024, 06:29:02 PM »
Only commemorate the 'nice' history


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp38z28yjpvo

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11143
  • God? She's black.
Re: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2024, 10:12:57 AM »
I should think not either.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2024, 02:03:57 PM »
Only commemorate the 'nice' history


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp38z28yjpvo
I would be against it because it doesn't seem all that notable. A gig got out of hand. So what?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65852
Re: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2024, 02:11:12 PM »
I would be against it because it doesn't seem all that notable. A gig got out of hand. So what?
Yes, I don't think it's a gig known outwith Bury