Author Topic: Shakespeare  (Read 4276 times)

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Shakespeare
« Reply #25 on: April 25, 2016, 12:20:37 PM »
Sure he does, which as already pointed out doesn't automatically make him wrong.

No the evidence makes him very probably wrong.

Quote
The anti-Stratfordians, as they're known, disagree with this otherwise they would have no case to make
There are several contemporary references to Shakespeare that support the view that he wrote the plays. This is a matter of record. There are no contemporary references that support the view that he did not write the plays. This is also a matter of record.

Quote
Hope in #17 disagrees with you, so you'd better take it up with him ("His authorship was being questioned even whilst he was alive").

It's Hope. If I ask him for evidence, he'll just say he already presented it at some point in the past.

Quote
The anti-Stratfordians write books and make documentaries and give lectures and suchlike.
As do the Moon Hoaxers, JFK conspiracists and 911 Truthers.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Shakespeare
« Reply #26 on: April 25, 2016, 12:21:07 PM »
His authorship was being questioned even whilst he was alive

Who by?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65801
Re: Shakespeare
« Reply #27 on: April 25, 2016, 01:27:05 PM »
There was a time I was quite fascinated by the idea of a mystery author to Shakespeares's plays. There's a small industry of books and theories. So I took sometime to look at it, in conjunction with studying the plays, and nada, niente, nothing of any real weight.

As jeremyp has outlined, there is nothing contemporary that calls it into question and, substantial amounts that at the time the plays were written back him up as the author. Given the reputatition of Sir Philip Sidney, writing earlier, the whole hiding the authorship idea makes no sense.


He'd been dead over 200 years by the time the howls of incredulity began which were never built on much more than snobbery. It also doesn't even begin to take into account that plays like Two Noble Kinsman are collaborations.  Nearly all the theories involve plays released after alleged authors were dead, were out the country, and are by many magnitudes more unlikely than that a glover's son educated at an excellent school had the knowledge and ability.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2016, 01:47:06 PM by Nearly Sane »