Author Topic: 'Rivers of Blood'  (Read 3078 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65804
Re: 'Rivers of Blood'
« Reply #25 on: April 17, 2018, 08:36:51 AM »
The only reference that I can find to the actor associated with the OP are the following sentences in the BBC link.

Does playing a character in a play based on a real individual make an actor sympathetic to the views of that individual?


As regards the OP, what I was referring to was this

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/theatre/actors/ian-mcdiarmid-interview-enoch-powell-not-racist/

Udayana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5478
  • βε ηερε νοω
    • The Byrds - My Back Pages
Re: 'Rivers of Blood'
« Reply #26 on: April 17, 2018, 09:03:06 AM »
Or can be read here:
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-daily-telegraph/20170905/281539406104218

Though, the views of the actor are probably a minor side issue.

Have not heard the programme yet, but I expect it to be interesting. The speech was important and, I think, did affect the course for subsequent developments regarding immigration and "multi-culturalism" - though not as Powell might have intended.   
Ah, but I was so much older then ... I'm younger than that now

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: 'Rivers of Blood'
« Reply #27 on: April 17, 2018, 10:35:47 AM »
The only reference that I can find to the actor associated with the OP are the following sentences in the BBC link.

Does playing a character in a play based on a real individual make an actor sympathetic to the views of that individual?

No, clearly it doesn’t. I’ve heard actors say they’ve discovered that they sympathise with a person usually regarded as unsympathetic, but many speak of playing monsters who remain monstrous.

I think though that if McDiarmid doesn’t regard the speech as racist then there’s a degree of sympathy there, but I don’t know where NS got his info.

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: 'Rivers of Blood'
« Reply #28 on: April 17, 2018, 10:39:15 AM »