E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
He's been awarded Italian citizenship, which adds a twist.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-4387267
More exploitation. Italian govt playing politics with a child.
Many and sharp the num'rous illsInwoven with our frame!More pointed still we make ourselvesRegret, remorse, and shame!And man, whose heav'n-erected faceThe smiles of love adorn, –Man's inhumanity to manMakes countless thousands mourn!
Apparently the baby has been taken off life support and is now breathing on his own. I thought he couldn't breath without the life support?
So is he suffering more or less than when on life support? Shouldn't it be ended? What is in the best interests of the child?
Since they have appointed themselves as the best judges of what is in the child's interest, they are responsible for any continued or, indeed, increased suffering.
Eh? I think you may have misread my post. Any judge making a legal decision here has not appointed themselves.
But they think they are competent to judge. Otherwise they would absent themselves from the position. There’s an element of self-appointment there.
And what if they absent tthemselves? A decision needs to be made but they back away from their job?
If they accept the job then they are saying that they are competent to make life and death judgements. Nothing wrong with that on that someone has to - in fact I admire their courage in doing so - but by stepping up there is an element of self appointment there. Otherwise they’d walk away.
I heard an interview on PM just now with the lawyer - American working for that, in my opinion, ghastly group calling themselves something with the word Christian in the title - and cringed.
I meant the state and court system rather than any particular judge. It seems to be a case where there is no rational basis on which a decision can be made, and it is ultimately an emotional one - as in many other cases which do not get to court.
I don’t know how this works but it sounds like a child is breathing unaided but then will end up fighting for breath before dying. That sounds like suffering to me. I’m assuming that sedation is available but not enough to end life, and as this is a child there may be an erring on the side of caution. ‘Letting nature take its course’ is a grim option.
That makes no more sense. Surely it's that we as a society have to have a method abstractions are made. The state and court system is just us.
Do you know what a judge does? Do you really think that a judge can walk away from a case?You may be interested in the discussion involving a former High Court judge and a parent who had a seriously ill child in The World at One today. It talks place about 10 minutes into the programme.https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09zt3fv
Didn't they include another case where a sick child survived being taken off life support for quite a long time?