Hom. sap. hasn't existed for millions of years! Ffs - if you must disagree for the sake of disagreeing, at least don't ignore known facts!
My turn - are you being deliberately dense? Of course we haven't been homo sapiens for millions of years, but we evolved from things that were there millions of years ago. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe not all of us have evolved reading skills?
You see how that attitude grates?
Now, what became homo sapiens evolved traits over millions of years, some of which became the complex language and tool using skills we currently enjoy - the advent of each of this individual elements was random, so I ask again - should we consider the emergency of that particular combination of traits to be significant enough to justify some sort of 'unique' classification, or should we accept that the fortunate confluence of individual traits which we see in other organisms has had a fortunate compound effect and that we are not 'unique' in any underlying way, we are just fortunate in the combination of traits we've inherited?
O.