As you will remember, that was tried in the late 60s. It was so unpopular that they had to revert to the clocks changing.
People would have got used to it soon enough. We effectively operated on GMT+1 during the entire war without too many issues.
(especially in northern Scotland, where it wasn't getting light until almost 10:00)
This is a misrepresentation of the situation. In Glasgow on the shortest day of the year, sunrise would be at about 9.45am. For most of the winter period it would rise earlier than that.
Don't come back with the road-safety argument; I don't believe it. Fiddling around with the clocks doesn't increase the actual hours of daylight: in midwinter, you've got to either go to work or come home in the dark,
In Glasgow in midwinter, you do both in the dark.
After the experiment in the 60's they found there was am increase in accidents in the morning, but a much bigger decrease in accidents in the evening. Unfortunately, the water was muddied because, at the same time, it became illegal to drink and drive. So there's no really reliable statistics either way.
whatever scheme is in place. I think it'd be a pity never to have the clock time approximating to solar time, which is what GMT is.
Why? What does it matter?
Bear in mind, too, that it is always possible for an individual employer to vary the hours of attendance for its emplyees: a blanket time-change isn't necessary.
This is correct, so why do we do a blanket time change twice a year?