Author Topic: LGBT+: are we allowed heterodox opinions?  (Read 2598 times)

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11150
  • God? She's black.
Re: LGBT+: are we allowed heterodox opinions?
« Reply #25 on: December 07, 2019, 12:57:13 PM »
The thread as I understand it, is about people who are different to the norm, which paedophiles definitely are. However, not for one second would I suggest that LGBTs are any more likely to be paedophiles than heterosexuals, I wish to make that clear.
The test is, does a sexual interest or orientation do any harm to anyone else? If the answer is "no", then it's morally ok (though it may not be altogether desirable from the person's point of view, if it takes over their life and gets in the way of normal relationships: some sexual fetishes might fall into that category). Paedophilia, sadism, flashing, and raping obviously fail the test. Homosexuality, bisexuality, transvestism and some other orientations and interests pass. Some are in a grey area: attraction to obesity, for example. Obesity is unhealthy, but the fact is that obese people exist, and as long as the person with the attraction is not actively encouraging the object of their attraction to put on weight, it is probably ok.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2019, 12:59:27 PM by Steve H »
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: LGBT+: are we allowed heterodox opinions?
« Reply #26 on: December 07, 2019, 06:31:04 PM »
Are they? Do you appreciate the difference between pansexual and bisexual, for instance?  Why, if transgender identity is 'acceptable' is gender-fluid not?

O.

What does "gender fluid" actually mean?

This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: LGBT+: are we allowed heterodox opinions?
« Reply #27 on: December 07, 2019, 06:37:09 PM »
Paedophilia, sadism, flashing, and raping obviously fail the test.

Sadism doesn't fail the test as long as you can find a consenting masochist as a partner and as long as your activities don't cause real harm.

This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: LGBT+: are we allowed heterodox opinions?
« Reply #28 on: December 07, 2019, 07:12:02 PM »
What does "gender fluid" actually mean?
i think it's that runny stuff that comes out of peoples sex organs Jezza 😱

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14733
Re: LGBT+: are we allowed heterodox opinions?
« Reply #29 on: December 09, 2019, 09:01:49 AM »
What does "gender fluid" actually mean?

To my understanding, and there may well be complexities to it that I'm not familiar with, it's where you accept the concept of masculine and feminine genders, but you don't feel beholden to one or the other, so some days you feel/dress/act as your culture sees women, and on another day you act as your culture sees men, and presumably there are some who see it as covering those people who choose to mix and match at times as well.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints