Only read three of these:
Hill house, some of the Clive Barker and IT.
Reading the article I do wonder if the choice of IT was more to do with the memory of the TV production of which he said: " I watched the TV adaptation with Tim Curry, which is spectacularly well done."
I think that one sentence should serve as a slight warning. Spectacularly? Really? Competent, yes. Good on the childhood stuff, yes. But spectacularly well done, no.
The recent films were more spectacularly well done, and they weren't brilliant.