Rubbish. You're just trying to avoid the question because you know the answer is yes.
Nope. Unlike you I’m not a simpleton coming up with one word answers. You’re making a claim that Prophet Muhammad spread his religious ideas by means of violence. The burden of proof is on you to provide credible evidence in order for your claim to be taken seriously.
Given the stories about this nomadic tribesman were passed down through oral tradition, I am not sure how far you will get finding archaeological evidence of any kind of state administration to show how religious ideas were spread. There is a document purporting to be the constitution of Medina, supposedly drawn up in AD 622 after Prophet Muhammad fled from Mecca to Medina for protection (at the invitation of the tribes in Medina) in his 13th year of being an itinerant preacher, as he found himself in imminent danger of being murdered by the powerful tribes of Mecca for preaching Islam. But it's seen as a political document rather than a religious document.
Something that might hamper your evidence gathering is that Prophet Muhammad is supposed to have died in AD 632 The constitution of Medina is taken from a biography of Prophet Muhammad written about 100 years after Prophet Muhammad died.
So much for your claim of a one word response.
How did he acquire that state? Was violence involved.
Your claim was about Prophet Muhammad’s spread of religious ideas. You’re making the claim . Go look for the credible evidence and let me know how you get on in condensing it into a one word response on this forum.
How was that empire acquired? Was violence involved?
Your claim was about Prophet Muhammad’s spread of religious ideas. You’re making the claim . Go look for the credible evidence on the empire before he is supposed to have died and let me know how you get on in condensing it into one word on this forum.
Beheading somebody for mocking your religion looks bad to me. I'm sorry you don't like that I am prejudiced against murder, but I am and so should any reasonable person be.
You may well be prejudiced against murder but why change the topic from your anti-Muslim bigotry. It just makes you look like a dishonest anti-Muslim bigot, rather than just an anti-Muslim bigot.
My post said the issue of free speech generates a lot of public debate amongst the people of France and I gave an example of where French laws limit freedom of expression and said it’s not a simple debate.
Have some evidence for my point:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3325285.stmYour response to me, the only Muslim poster on this forum. was to ask me what my point was and then ask me if I thought it was ok to behead people. What was your point in asking that question to the only Muslim poster, but not to the non-Muslim posters who responded to the OP by discussing free speech? When I did not dignify your question with a response, your follow up posts to me keep making the point that it’s not ok to behead people.
How long are you going to continue making a complete dick of yourself by putting on a display of your anti-Muslim bigotry on here?
