E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Something deeply depressing about this. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-62560997
Really? https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/aug/21/gps-could-prescribe-money-off-energy-bills-under-treasury-plan
No chance given the majority and self preservation. Next general election will be Dec 2024, or after Starmet is found to have raped the Queen, as she lay dying, while eating a puppy, and shooting David Attenborough.
What an unpleasant post.
You should be ashamed of yourself, but obviously you aren't! At one time you could be done for treason for those remarks and rightly so.
Not under Scots law, you couldn't. Makars - poets - used to compete in court circles to see who could be most offensive.The action was called 'Flyting'.It was encouraged by James IV and V.
Just to point out that even in the vacuous idea of treason, my comments are not treasonous. Indeed, I could happily argue that my statement is about how great the monarchy is, along with puppies, and David Attenborough.
Two out of three make a mess.Attenbourogh excluded.
Always nice to see a blasphemy supporter.
Just like to point out that blasphemy and treason are different crimes things. Anyway it is certainly treasonous to suggest, as you did, that the Queen would eat puppies.
I'd read that as Starmer eating puppies