Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => Sports, Hobbies & Interests => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on March 22, 2024, 08:56:45 AM
-
Starmer slides in to tackle Nike on Flaggate
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68632034
-
Sunak now joined Starmer in Flaggate but then they are just 'rent-a-gobs'
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/mar/21/football-daily-england-kit-cross
-
More importantly, who the hell would pay 100 quid for football merchandise. Bloody rip off!
-
I see Peter Shilton is confused about the England flag
"and red white and blue are the colours that we have on our flag".
-
'Taxi driver Joe in Stirling said he had "steam" coming out of his ears: "People died for that flag thousands of years ago".'
I have to hope Joe was Steve Coogan phoning in.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68640129
-
I see Peter Shilton is confused about the England flag
"and red white and blue are the colours that we have on our flag".
Yes it's true
https://www.balls.ie/football/peter-shilton-error-england-kit-591835
-
'Taxi driver Joe in Stirling said he had "steam" coming out of his ears: "People died for that flag thousands of years ago".'
I have to hope Joe was Steve Coogan phoning in.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68640129
Well people did die for that flag thousands of years ago, if by "thousands" you mean "about one thousand". It was a symbol used in the crusades. Lots of people died because of the crusades.
-
Starmer slides in to tackle Nike on Flaggate
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68632034
Starmer makes two points regarding the shirts - the flag design AND the exorbitant pricing - but I see that only one of them creates sufficient click-bait to be a headline.
O.
-
Starmer makes two points regarding the shirts - the flag design AND the exorbitant pricing - but I see that only one of them creates sufficient click-bait to be a headline.
O.
Because nobody cares about the exorbitant price. Football shirts have been priced exorbitantly for many years.
-
Starmer makes two points regarding the shirts - the flag design AND the exorbitant pricing - but I see that only one of them creates sufficient click-bait to be a headline.
O.
Perhaps a more savvy politician might have chosen to ignore making a comment that would always have been led on?
Aren't all headlines by definition clickbait?