71
E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Indeed.Ditto
I think Gordon, you'll find anyway not to answer the question.
Your question "Should Historians be able to declare that the resurrection never happened rather than "the resurrection is outside the scope of history" and even the latter sounds odd." indicates that you really don't understand the implications of methodological naturalism, since if you did you wouldn't have asked that particular question.I think Gordon, you'll find anyway not to answer the question.
Or didn't. It's not a claim that makes sense in methodological naturalism
You don't seem to have answered my question here. Let me guess. Like Gordon you have departmental manager syndrome, being used to ask the questions and being in a position of never having to answer any.
You don't seem to have answered my question here. Let me guess. Like Gordon you have departmental manager syndrome, being used to ask the questions and being in a position of never having to answer any.I pointed out why it was both irrelevant and specious.
At no point have you said anything about anything.Diddums!
At no point have I said that in recognised universities in the UK. it is declared that the resurrection did not happen. You seem to be confused again by the difference between methodological and philosophical naturalism.At no point have you said anything about anything.
oh look you have once again elided the study of history and 'history' . At no point have I said that in recognised universities in the UK. it is declared that the resurrection did not happen. You seem to be confused again by the difference between methodological and philosophical naturalism.You don't seem to have answered my question here. Let me guess. Like Gordon you have departmental manager syndrome, being used to ask the questions and being in a position of never having to answer any.