Assisted Suicide bill to be debated in parliament

[Outrider]

That'll be an early end for some that didn't really want it.

Potentially, pitched against the definite history of people forced to keep going through pain, suffering, and indignity longer than they wanted...

Time now to see if the Lords Spiritual are going to keep up their record of standing on the wrong side of history.

O.

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Potentially, pitched against the definite history of people forced to keep going through pain, suffering, and indignity longer than they wanted...

Time now to see if the Lords Spiritual are going to keep up their record of standing on the wrong side of history.

O.

I don't think you like the reality of supporting the early end of those that didn't really want it.

[Nearly Sane]

I don't think you like the reality of supporting the early end of those that didn't really want it.

Repeating above assertion doesn't make it anything more than assertion.

[Nearly Sane]

Potentially, pitched against the definite history of people forced to keep going through pain, suffering, and indignity longer than they wanted...

Time now to see if the Lords Spiritual are going to keep up their record of standing on the wrong side of history.

O.

The wrong side of history surely makes a claim to objective morality?

[Walt Zingmatilder]

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jun/20/assisted-dying-bill-how-will-it-work-and-when-will-it-come-into-effect

[Nearly Sane]

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jun/20/assisted-dying-bill-how-will-it-work-and-when-will-it-come-into-effect

is there anything you would like to highlight from the article? Is there anything that might help you justify your unevidenced claim about it supporting  'the reality of supporting the early end of those that didn't really want it.',

[Walt Zingmatilder]

is there anything you would like to highlight from the article? Is there anything that might help you justify your unevidenced claim about it supporting  'the reality of supporting the early end of those that didn't really want it.',

It appears to me that some who voted for it became unsatisfied because levels of jurisdiction were taken away and some did not seem to be in place.

That it is passed is how our democracy works.
The job of convincing those with reservations falls on those who support this wholeheartedly. I think they own future outcomes.

[Nearly Sane]

It appears to me that some who voted for it became unsatisfied because levels of jurisdiction were taken away and some did not seem to be in place.

That it is passed is how our democracy works.
The job of convincing those with reservations falls on those who support this wholeheartedly. I think they own future outcomes.

So no evidence

[Nearly Sane]

As so often nowadays it is the arguments of supporters of things that put me off, more than the arguments of opponents


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx23nd10295o

[Outrider]

The wrong side of history surely makes a claim to objective morality?

No, it makes a claim towards increased recognition of individual rights over time.

O.