Author Topic: (ontological) Naturewatch.  (Read 9857 times)

How would you describe yourself?

Athiest
5 (26.3%)
abrahamic monotheist
4 (21.1%)
pantheist
0 (0%)
scientific pantheist
0 (0%)
agnostic
2 (10.5%)
materialist
0 (0%)
antitheist
2 (10.5%)
polytheist
0 (0%)
panentheist
1 (5.3%)
other
5 (26.3%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Author Topic: (ontological) Naturewatch.  (Read 9857 times)

SqueakyVoice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2560
  • from God, "We apologise for the inconvenience."
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #25 on: April 04, 2016, 06:48:41 PM »
Now the votes show there are three people who think they're athiest.

But at least two of them must be over-estimating how athy they are...?

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #26 on: April 04, 2016, 09:06:02 PM »
Tried it but my monocle fell out :(
Stop making a spectacle of yourself.

Étienne d'Angleterre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #27 on: April 04, 2016, 09:28:30 PM »
Stop making a spectacle of yourself.


Very good

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #28 on: April 05, 2016, 11:55:27 AM »
On forum at 11.59
3 Christian,3 atheist, 1 panentheist, 1 pantheistic  (my assessment)

Brownie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3858
  • Faith evolves
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #29 on: April 05, 2016, 12:04:31 PM »
A good cross section then, Jon.
Pity there are no Jews and Muslims on the Jewish and Islamic topic forums.
Let us profit by what every day and hour teaches us

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #30 on: April 05, 2016, 12:13:14 PM »
Can you put up an option for atheist?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Brownie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3858
  • Faith evolves
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #31 on: April 05, 2016, 12:32:25 PM »
There is an atheist option.  Atheists are leading in the poll at the moment.
Let us profit by what every day and hour teaches us

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65872
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #32 on: April 05, 2016, 12:50:54 PM »
A good cross section then, Jon.
Pity there are no Jews and Muslims on the Jewish and Islamic topic forums.

Gabriella posts on the Muslim Topic forum, though she isn't always about.

Gonnagle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11421
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #33 on: April 05, 2016, 12:52:48 PM »
Dear Vlad,

I put other, I am definitely other, what's this thread about, only The Vlad Knows :o :o

Gonnagle.
For the sake of my sanity I will now endeavour to aid Atheists in their thinking not do their thinking for them✝️✝️✝️

SqueakyVoice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2560
  • from God, "We apologise for the inconvenience."
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #34 on: April 05, 2016, 01:02:44 PM »
There is an atheist option.  Atheists are leading in the poll at the moment.
No, one can vote oneself the most athy, but, by definition there can only be one poster who is the athiest.

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #35 on: April 05, 2016, 01:37:40 PM »
Dear Vlad,

I put other, I am definitely other, what's this thread about, only The Vlad Knows :o :o

Gonnagle.
Is that a Protestant other or a catholic other?

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7760
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #36 on: April 05, 2016, 01:58:23 PM »
Can we have optons for,

Swivel eyed turd polisher.
Existentialist excrement shoveler.
Trollboy.
Vladist.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #37 on: April 05, 2016, 02:17:19 PM »
Can we have optons for,

Swivel eyed turd polisher.
Existentialist excrement shoveler.
Trollboy.
Vladist.
Swivel legend turd polishers are retired from the polishing on health and safety grounds
Existentialist excrement shovelers................do they exist?
A troll-boy is a type of a hat
Everyone needs to confront their Vlad side.

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7760
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #38 on: April 05, 2016, 02:24:18 PM »
A troll-boy is a type of a hat

If the cap fits............
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #39 on: April 05, 2016, 02:26:47 PM »
If the cap fits............
Stop being a titfer goodness sake.

Gonnagle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11421
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #40 on: April 05, 2016, 02:31:33 PM »
Dear Vlad,

Quote
Is that a Protestant other or a catholic other?

A bit of both although I think the Caffy's have the better tunes, Low lie the Fields of Athenry and of course, The old Triangle plays Jingle Jangle all along the banks but then the Sash always gets the old feet a thumping.

What!! you can take the Proddy dog out of the Protestant but you can never take the Protestant out of the proddy dog.

Gonnagle.
For the sake of my sanity I will now endeavour to aid Atheists in their thinking not do their thinking for them✝️✝️✝️

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #41 on: April 05, 2016, 02:36:35 PM »
Dear Vlad,

A bit of both although I think the Caffy's have the better tunes, Low lie the Fields of Athenry and of course, The old Triangle plays Jingle Jangle all along the banks but then the Sash always gets the old feet a thumping.

What!! you can take the Proddy dog out of the Protestant but you can never take the Protestant out of the proddy dog.

Gonnagle.
I'll put you down as Church of England then.

Gonnagle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11421
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #42 on: April 05, 2016, 02:39:30 PM »
Dear Vlad,

My first laugh out loud today, cheers ;D ;D

Gonnagle.
For the sake of my sanity I will now endeavour to aid Atheists in their thinking not do their thinking for them✝️✝️✝️

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #43 on: April 05, 2016, 03:38:01 PM »
On forum at 15.37

6 atheist 2 christian

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #44 on: April 05, 2016, 05:24:39 PM »
On forum as of 17.22

6 atheist, 1 Christian.

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18672
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #45 on: April 05, 2016, 05:37:01 PM »
On forum as of 17.22

6 atheist, 1 Christian.

Just a minor point, Vlad, right now there are two more than you can see, since some members hide their online status: I can see them, for obvious reasons, but you can't, so your stats are compromised since you don't know who they are.

Just so you know, and during busy periods there are often higher numbers of 'hidden' members online.

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #46 on: April 05, 2016, 05:43:33 PM »
Just a minor point, Vlad, right now there are two more than you can see, since some members hide their online status: I can see them, for obvious reasons, but you can't, so your stats are compromised since you don't know who they are.

Just so you know, and during busy periods there are often higher numbers of 'hidden' members online.
You go right on Gordon. I have been adding that this is my assessment. Do you think people have forgotten that?

I'm just going by the names that crop up. I think talk of my 'stats' is a bit strong for that observation don't you think......all though I think it does rather suggest far more antis than pro Christians.

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18672
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #47 on: April 05, 2016, 05:51:46 PM »
You go right on Gordon. I have been adding that this is my assessment. Do you think people have forgotten that?

I'm just going by the names that crop up. I think talk of my 'stats' is a bit strong for that observation don't you think......all though I think it does rather suggest far more antis than pro Christians.

Since your 'assessment' involves categorisation that is dependent on at least knowing who is around then your assessment must be incomplete almost every time you do the assessing since 'hidden' members are always a possibility.

I couldn't possibly comment since folk who choose hidden presumably want to stay hidden. I'll leave any soul-searching over incomplete data and misleading results to you!

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #48 on: April 05, 2016, 06:16:48 PM »
on forum at 18.13

34 Guests, 6 Users (1 Hidden)

Users active in past 15 minutes:
4 atheists. 1 Christian named*

Source: Religionethics, * indicates my assessment.

Free Willy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33882
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #49 on: April 05, 2016, 06:20:15 PM »
Since your 'assessment' involves categorisation that is dependent on at least knowing who is around then your assessment must be incomplete almost every time you do the assessing since 'hidden' members are always a possibility.

I couldn't possibly comment since folk who choose hidden presumably want to stay hidden. I'll leave any soul-searching over incomplete data and misleading results to you!

Gordon I have said that what I am doing here is non statistical and my assessment. People have a right to judge it for themselves and I am not claiming accuracy. Your response therefore seems like a piece of pompous prickery designed to besmirch.......am I wrong?