I'm getting to think that a thread being turned into another arena for the never ending struggle between new atheism and, well, everything that isn't, comes with the territory of a forum marked Religionethics.
I think you'll find it was Floos 26th commandment what done it.
NO, it is your terminal inability to understand a single word that is said to you in definition of exactly what a fallacy, any fallacy, is!
Your insistence that you do not have to prove the God exists because atheists, or anyone else for that matter, cannot prove that he does not merely demonstrates your abysmal ignorabnce on the subject of fallacies, which has, incidentally killed almost as many threads as have the blind and brainwashed proponents of Christainity.
Oh and, of course, that which you fondly think of as your sense of humour and you erudition in the matter of -isms.
