See above.
That helps me, not you. That illustrates the case of people who know what a fallacy is correctly identifying something which is called one (by those who don't know, i.e. the fundies referred to) but actually isn't.
It's the mirror image of those same people correctly identifying a fallacy as a fallacy whenever one crops up (which in the case of this forum is about every ten to fifteen minutes at most), or what you usually insist on boorishly calling pretentious pseudo-intellectual childish showing-off bollocks.
If you're reasonably up to speed on some fairly basic and bog-standard logic then you understand what a fallacy is and (most importantly of all)
why it's fallacious. This stuff isn't at all difficult and it's absolutely not obscure. It's not only easy; I would go further and say that it's fun, too.
Which then begets the question as to why so many ostensibly otherwise intelligent people continue to trot them out, not just over and over again, but over and over again
even after it has been pointed out to them why their would-be argument is fallacious. It's a very curious psychological phenomenon - essentially a form of the Dunning-Kruger effect, I think, where some people overestimate (sometimes massively) their actual abilities or competence.
And of course plain old intellectual arrogance/bruised vanity at being told that they're wrong.
