Author Topic: Rental e-scooters to be made legal on roads in Great Britain from Saturday  (Read 9257 times)


Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
Bloody ridiculous. I sopped playing with scooters when I was about seven. Some people need to grow up. I saw a 30+ bloke jumping the gun, riding one on the road, yesterday. Twat.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945

Good idea?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53219331?fbclid=IwAR3cLecGsdDUoIJ2V6WjLGCKByoaB-3I8qy8bkgrjRkA9qp7fdCFiprpk7M


Better than allowing them to race along the pavements with absolutely no regard for the pedestrians also using them.

Over the past four or five months, there have been at least five accidents involving these near-lethal lazy bugger transportation devices on the stretch of pavement outside the shops across from Hounslow West Station.

 
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8117
A ridiculous idea, I think they will cause accidents.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
A ridiculous idea, I think they will cause accidents.
Even LR is right occasionally.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7760
A ridiculous idea, I think they will cause accidents.
In what way?
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
In what way?
Too slow, not visible enough, no lights.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8117
Too slow, not visible enough, no lights.

Agreed
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945

In what way?


Mis-judging the distance between two pedestrians and so sitting both on their arses on the pavement then rapidly disappearing in the distance without a backward glance.

Knocking over children who are walking with their backs to ten approaching scooter.



The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65854
Mis-judging the distance between two pedestrians and so sitting both on their arses on the pavement then rapidly disappearing in the distance without a backward glance.

Knocking over children who are walking with their backs to ten approaching scooter.
So cars are a bad idea? Because you can do both of those in them.

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
So cars are a bad idea? Because you can do both of those in them.
We can always rely on NS for a daft analogy. Cars don't normally drive on the pavement.
Anyway, yes - cars are a bad idea.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14733
We can always rely on NS for a daft analogy. Cars don't normally drive on the pavement.

I would have gone with pushbike myself, I think it's a better analogy.

Too slow - about comparable with a pushbike
Not visible enough - about comparable with a pushbike
No lights - most pushbikes don't come with lights.

Seems like a perfectly serviceable solution to the sort of traffic problems that plague inner city areas at the moment.  Smaller, lighter, quieter transport which makes a more efficient use of fossil fuels... There are already rules for the use of small personal transport vehicles which could apply with only minor amendments.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65854
T
We can always rely on NS for a daft analogy. Cars don't normally drive on the pavement.
Anyway, yes - cars are a bad idea.

I take it you have somehow missed the title of the thread. It's about them being driven on the road.


So please explain the problem with the analogy?

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
T
I take it you have somehow missed the title of the thread. It's about them being driven on the road.


So please explain the problem with the analogy?
Certainly, dear boy, since you ask so politely. Owlswing was obviously talking about their use on pavements.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65854
Certainly, dear boy, since you ask so politely. Owlswing was obviously talking about their use on pavements.
Which given the question is whether they are a good idea on roads is then irrelevant.

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
Which given the question is whether they are a good idea on roads is then irrelevant.
Your argument is with Owly, not me.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65854
Your argument is with Owly, not me.
No, you said the analogy was bad when I was taking the question in the context of the thread. It wasn't so that part of the argument is with you.

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
Wodevva. ::)
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Enki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3912
Which given the question is whether they are a good idea on roads is then irrelevant.

Yes, I thought it was about e-scooters(rented ones) being driven on certain roads/cycle paths, not on the pavements. My take on it is that it is quite reasonable to do so, just as bicycles are allowed on certain roads also, but not on pavements. As I understand it, they won't be allowed to be driven on pavements anyway so I don't see the point of the argument.
Sometimes I wish my first word was 'quote,' so that on my death bed, my last words could be 'end quote.'
Steven Wright

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11147
  • God? She's black.
bicycles are allowed on certain roads also, but not on pavements.
Bicycles are allowed on all roads except Motorways, and also on bridleways, off-road cycle paths, and canal towpaths (strictly speaking, you need a free licence to use towpaths, but no-one bothers). They are also allowed on cycle paths on pavements, and on shared-use pavements, but I never ride on pavements because bikes and pedestrians don't mix, and encouraging cyclists to use pavements is just surrendering to the infernal congestion engine.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7760
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945

 So cars are a bad idea? Because you can do both of those in them.


Please see #2

I said that having them on the road was better than having them on the pavement! As they are at present!

« Last Edit: July 01, 2020, 04:47:34 PM by Owlswing »
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65854
Please see #2

I said that having them on the road was better than having them on the pavement! As they are at present!
Seb Toe asked why were they a bad idea in the context of the thread being allowed on roads, your arguments were irrelevant.
And they aren't legal on pavements.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2020, 05:23:09 PM by Nearly Sane »

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8117
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53253194

The RNIB is very concerned about how these e-scooters could endanger blind and partially sight people.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Enki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3912
Bicycles are allowed on all roads except Motorways, and also on bridleways, off-road cycle paths, and canal towpaths (strictly speaking, you need a free licence to use towpaths, but no-one bothers). They are also allowed on cycle paths on pavements, and on shared-use pavements, but I never ride on pavements because bikes and pedestrians don't mix, and encouraging cyclists to use pavements is just surrendering to the infernal congestion engine.

That's exactly why I said 'certain' roads, or else some bright spark would have probably tried to remind me that they aren't allowed on motorways. :)

I would far rather ride on shared-use pavements because it is far less dangerous for me than riding on the accompanying road. I am always careful to avoid pedestrians of course. Indeed, I rode on one(the pavement not the pedestrian :D) today.
Sometimes I wish my first word was 'quote,' so that on my death bed, my last words could be 'end quote.'
Steven Wright