Author Topic: The removal of 'prejudiced language'  (Read 1861 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« on: September 02, 2020, 10:34:58 PM »
Dictionaries always have an involvement in politics in many ways but this isn't going to be easy.

https://amp.theguardian.com/books/2020/sep/01/dictionarycom-revises-definitions-eliminate-prejudiced-language?__twitter_impression=true

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2020, 10:56:16 PM »
Lot of silly nonsense. I don't use Dictionary.com, and certainly won't start now.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11629
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2020, 11:07:50 PM »
Lot of silly nonsense. I don't use Dictionary.com, and certainly won't start now.

Why is it silly nonsense?

I don't disagree with NS's opening statement. It is very difficult to change language in a formal way that has been in use a long time, although language changes organically all the time, but the fact that they are thinking and acting on this is, I think a good thing, Even if it fails, which it may well do.

What got me thinking was "commit suicide" a definition (from another dictionary) of which follows:

Quote
a phrase used to mean “to kill yourself”, which is now considered offensive because it suggests that doing this is a crime

As a society do you think we perhaps should move away from a phrase that is so weighted with judgement?

As I said, it will probably not be that successful but it may change some minds about the way they use certain words and phrases, which although not meaning to be, may be considered hurtful or judgemental by others.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2020, 11:11:30 PM by Trentvoyager »
If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. - God is Love.

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2020, 11:30:00 PM »


What got me thinking was "commit suicide" a definition (from another dictionary) of which follows:

As a society do you think we perhaps should move away from a phrase that is so weighted with judgement?

Possibly, but dictionaries are supposed to describe language as actually used, not tell us how we ought to use it. I would expect a comprehensive dictionary to include "nigger" and "queer", for example, perhaps with a note saying that they are considered offensive. People still usually say "commit suicide", so the dictionary should include it.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33831
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2020, 11:34:22 PM »
Down with linguistic piracy and totalitarianism!

Ban yourselves.

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14724
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2020, 08:36:24 AM »
I guess my only 'concern' in this is whether this is being done in response to conventional usage or to try to influence it.  My impression was that dictionaries were updated to reflect usage, not to try to define it, but I don't know that Dictionary.com necessarily holds to that philosophy anyway.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8112
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2020, 08:56:05 AM »
The 'N' word should be BANNED from all dictionaries, as it is more offensive than even the worst of swear words, which aren't included, are they?
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11629
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2020, 09:00:17 AM »
The 'N' word should be BANNED from all dictionaries, as it is more offensive than even the worst of swear words, which aren't included, are they?

A quick goggle would say that you are wrong in that assertion. Certainly Collins dictionary online gives the definition for "cunt".

On reflection I don't think you can ban nigger or any other contentious words. I do think an approach that informs and suggests alternatives would be much more reasonable.

Edit: Also checked my "real" Collins dictionary and both "fuck" & "cunt" are present and correct.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2020, 09:10:18 AM by Trentvoyager »
If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. - God is Love.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2020, 09:01:16 AM »
The 'N' word should be BANNED from all dictionaries, as it is more offensive than even the worst of swear words, which aren't included, are they?

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/fuck




Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2020, 09:19:44 AM »
The 'N' word should be BANNED from all dictionaries, as it is more offensive than even the worst of swear words, which aren't included, are they?
Of course they're included, as should "nigger" be. The word exists, so a comprehensive dictionary should include it.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Stranger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8453
  • Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2020, 09:22:49 AM »
The 'N' word should be BANNED from all dictionaries, as it is more offensive than even the worst of swear words, which aren't included, are they?

Don't know what you consider the most offensive words but the BBC devoted an entire episode of program Balderdash and Piffle about the Oxford English Dictionary, to the word "cunt": Germaine Greer on the C Word (Balderdash and Piffle).
x(∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀y(yxy ∪ {y} ∈ x))

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33831
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2020, 10:24:33 AM »
I guess my only 'concern' in this is whether this is being done in response to conventional usage or to try to influence it.  My impression was that dictionaries were updated to reflect usage, not to try to define it, but I don't know that Dictionary.com necessarily holds to that philosophy anyway.

O.
post of the week

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33831
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2020, 10:27:48 AM »
I’m an autoeroticist but still inordinately fond of the old dictionary definition of masturbation as sexual self abuse.

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11629
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2020, 10:40:04 AM »
I’m an autoeroticist but still inordinately fond of the old dictionary definition of masturbation as sexual self abuse.

What's wrong with wanker?
If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. - God is Love.

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8112
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #14 on: September 03, 2020, 11:18:32 AM »
Of course they're included, as should "nigger" be. The word exists, so a comprehensive dictionary should include it.

I had no idea ghastly swear words were included in dictionaries, I am totally shocked. :o Why can't you refer to the abhorrent 'n' word by its initial? If you were a person of colour you might not be so thrilled to have it bandied about as you are doing!
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2020, 11:35:00 AM »
I had no idea ghastly swear words were included in dictionaries, I am totally shocked. :o Why can't you refer to the abhorrent 'n' word by its initial? If you were a person of colour you might not be so thrilled to have it bandied about as you are doing!
What do you think dictionaries are?

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8112
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2020, 11:45:31 AM »
What do you think dictionaries are?

I didn't they would contain swear words, I have never come across them in any of the dictionaries we have owned, thank goodness. ::) These days I look up words on-line, we have a Collins Thesaurus, which doesn't appear to contain any such words.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #17 on: September 03, 2020, 11:48:33 AM »
I didn't they would contain swear words, I have never come across them in any of the dictionaries we have owned, thank goodness. ::) These days I look up words on-line, we have a Collins Thesaurus, which doesn't appear to contain any such words.
That isn't answering the question. What do you think the purpose of a dictionary is?

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8112
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #18 on: September 03, 2020, 11:50:16 AM »
That isn'y answering the question. What do you think the purpose of a dictionary is?

Not to look up swear words, imo.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #19 on: September 03, 2020, 11:51:06 AM »
Not to look up swear words, imo.
Why not? It's there to look up words surely? They are words.

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8112
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #20 on: September 03, 2020, 11:54:15 AM »
Why not? It's there to look up words surely? They are words.

We are never going to see eye to eye on this topic, so I will leave it there. Suffice to say the use of swear words has never been tolerated in our home.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #21 on: September 03, 2020, 11:56:08 AM »
We are never going to see eye to eye on this topic, so I will leave it there. Suffice to say the use of swear words has never been tolerated in our home.
Which is completely irrelevant to what dictionaries are for.

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #22 on: September 03, 2020, 01:22:26 PM »
I had no idea ghastly swear words were included in dictionaries, I am totally shocked. :o Why can't you refer to the abhorrent 'n' word by its initial? If you were a person of colour you might not be so thrilled to have it bandied about as you are doing!
The word is "nigger". I hate it as much as anybody, but "the N word" is a stupid, twee euphemism, and completely pointless, since we all know which word is meant.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #23 on: September 03, 2020, 01:26:04 PM »
We are never going to see eye to eye on this topic, so I will leave it there.
That's what you always say when you've run out of arguments, but refuse to admit that you're wrong.
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7757
Re: The removal of 'prejudiced language'
« Reply #24 on: September 03, 2020, 01:31:34 PM »
I didn't they would contain swear words, I have never come across them in any of the dictionaries we have owned, thank goodness. ::) These days I look up words on-line, we have a Collins Thesaurus, which doesn't appear to contain any such words.
A thesaurus isn't a dictionary.
Collins dictionary does contain those words, as it should.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein