Author Topic: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate  (Read 983 times)


ProfessorDavey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17993
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2020, 06:26:00 PM »
Lunacy

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/shaun-bailey-london-mayor-firm-drug-test-staff-a4531351.html
He's got form - he wants tube stations to adopt the name of corporate sponsors - so Knightbridge becomes 'Harrods' etc.

Imagine the level of confusion (and cost) when sponsorship deals end - so when Unilever (ex Blackfriars) becomes St Ives Group! You'll no longer change at err Victoria tube station to get a train at err Victoria Station, but at Vivo Energy. Want to visit St Paul's cathedral - get off at Bank of America (or at least until it changes its name to Avesoro Resources)!

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2020, 06:37:23 PM »
He's got form - he wants tube stations to adopt the name of corporate sponsors - so Knightbridge becomes 'Harrods' etc.

Imagine the level of confusion (and cost) when sponsorship deals end - so when Unilever (ex Blackfriars) becomes St Ives Group! You'll no longer change at err Victoria tube station to get a train at err Victoria Station, but at Vivo Energy. Want to visit St Paul's cathedral - get off at Bank of America (or at least until it changes its name to Avesoro Resources)!
Roaster

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14724
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2020, 01:12:30 PM »
It's not a policy with which I agree, but why is it lunacy?

These firms already pay taxes, why should they be funding checks for 'criminal' activity on their staff?  If it's not intended to get people fired then how is it going to be effective - what are the companies going to do with the information that will lead to any sort of decrease in the criminal activity?

The way to prevent organised crime profiting from the drugs trade is to decriminalise the drug trade.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2020, 01:18:42 PM »
I've read about this knob-head before. He obviously just wants to generate headlines (ideally, ones which call him a "mayoral candidate, unlike the ES).
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

ProfessorDavey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17993
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2020, 02:34:38 PM »
Roaster
I presume you mean 'Square Mile Coffee Roasters", the tube station formally known as Tottenham Hale

https://shop.squaremilecoffee.com

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2020, 03:38:15 PM »
These firms already pay taxes, why should they be funding checks for 'criminal' activity on their staff?  If it's not intended to get people fired then how is it going to be effective - what are the companies going to do with the information that will lead to any sort of decrease in the criminal activity?

The way to prevent organised crime profiting from the drugs trade is to decriminalise the drug trade.

O.

That wasn't what I was asking. As I said, I don't agree with the idea, but I wondered why it was considered to be "lunacy" rather than simply a bad idea.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14724
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2020, 08:56:47 AM »
That wasn't what I was asking. As I said, I don't agree with the idea, but I wondered why it was considered to be "lunacy" rather than simply a bad idea.

In part, I think, that's just journalistic hyperbole, but also because even if you're ideologically on the authoritarian end and inclined to impose laws and restrictions, it's a policy that makes no sense.

If the companies aren't supposed to be disciplining people for this ("it's not about getting people fired") then how is it going to be effective in any way?  It might, if the companies were to share the information, give the authorities better data on the extent of the problem, but that's not going to fix anything in and of itself.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2020, 09:11:09 AM »
In part, I think, that's just journalistic hyperbole,

The word was Nearly Sane's. It doesn't appear in the article.

Quote
but also because even if you're ideologically on the authoritarian end and inclined to impose laws and restrictions, it's a policy that makes no sense.

If the companies aren't supposed to be disciplining people for this ("it's not about getting people fired") then how is it going to be effective in any way?  It might, if the companies were to share the information, give the authorities better data on the extent of the problem, but that's not going to fix anything in and of itself.

O.

As I said: bad idea, but "lunacy"?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14724
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2020, 11:13:20 AM »
The word was Nearly Sane's. It doesn't appear in the article.

Still, perhaps, hyperbole.

Quote
As I said: bad idea, but "lunacy"?

A policy that has no feasible way of achieving its stated goal, implements a wedge between employers and employees, costs firm money and doesn't noticeably benefit the public in any way... it's at least stupidity...

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65809
Re: Drugs test policy from London Mayoral candidate
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2020, 12:26:03 PM »
See definition 2.




lu·na·cy  (lo͞o′nə-sē)

n. pl. lu·na·cies

1.

a. Mental derangement; craziness: "The Indians thought his obsession with giant bones a sign of harmless lunacy" (David Rains Wallace).

b. Archaic Intermittent mental derangement attributed to the changing phases of the moon.

2.

a. Great or wild foolishness: a policy that proved to be a piece of economic lunacy.

b. A wildly foolish or irrational act.