Author Topic: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!  (Read 726 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65814
Patronising, empty headed, and fatuous bilge.

https://archive.ph/ThzzB
« Last Edit: September 15, 2022, 12:21:54 PM by Nearly Sane »

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18640
Re: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2022, 12:29:09 PM »
Utter bollocks - the quicker these Tories implode the better.

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11637
Re: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2022, 01:07:10 PM »
Coffey is nauseating.

Her sole purpose in life is to make people vomit.
If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. - God is Love.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2022, 02:16:45 PM »
She's quite right about the Oxford comma.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Udayana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5478
  • βε ηερε νοω
    • The Byrds - My Back Pages
Re: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2022, 05:29:54 PM »
She's quite right about the Oxford comma.

How is she right? It is just a matter of style and adding it to her list just makes it even more patronising.
Ah, but I was so much older then ... I'm younger than that now

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11100
  • God? She's black.
Re: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2022, 11:05:58 PM »
I don't like Oxford commas either, but proscribing them is incredibly petty, patronising, and annoying (see what I did there?).
I came to realise that every time we recognise something human in creatures, we are also recognising something creaturely in ourselves. That is central to the rejection of human supremacism as the pernicious doctrine it is.
Robert Macfarlane

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33307
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2022, 09:23:39 AM »
How is she right? It is just a matter of style and adding it to her list just makes it even more patronising.

She's right because the Oxford comma does not resolve the problems of writing ambiguous English. Its advocates view it as some kind of silver bullet that will make all clear, usually invoking some silly made up example. We don't need it. We need to structure our sentences more carefully.

There's nothing like a petty and inconsequential rule to get people up in arms. I predict her next missive will be on the correct way to hang a toilet roll.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33831
Re: No Oxford comma use to save English NHS as long as staff are positive!
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2022, 09:59:55 PM »
The show isn't over until Therese Coffey sings.

SqueakyVoice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
  • from God, "We apologise for the inconvenience."