What an outrageous idea - as was what eventually happened, a move to Milton Keynes. Both ideas showed disregard for the fans, who obviously would not be able to visit the ground regularly, assuming they lived in or near Wimbledon (which many probably didn't, but it's still messing them around for the sake of politics). I know that there was much anger from the fans at the time. (Not that I give a toss about football, but I can understand how they felt.)
If AFC Wimbledon, the replacement club, have a stadium near the site of the old one, why couldn't Wimbledon FC have been given a new stadium there?