AB,
My logic is not just based upon very small probabilities, but on the absolute impossibility of you being able to make this post without the freedom given to you by the power of your human soul.
First, that’s not an “absolute impossibility†at all – it’s just an assertion you like to make. As it’s demonstrably the case that complex properties emerge from simple components that separately lack those properties, you have all your work ahead of you to show that consciousness isn’t just another example of the same phenomenon.
Because without this you would have no freedom at all, being driven entirely by the uncontrollable physical reactions occurring in your material brain.
Second, that’s called a
non sequitur - another mistake. You would of course have exactly the freedom you
appear to experience even if the reality behind it is more nuanced that it feels to the casual observer.
Third, you’ve completely ignored your circular reasoning problem. You posit a creator god, and then point to the unlikelihood of our existence but for that creator god
as evidence for that creator god. That’s your failure of reasoning. If you want to attempt an
argument you cannot make the two premises co-dependent – “creator god, therefore humans likely/humans otherwise unlikely, therefore creator god†is just circular and solipsistic.
For some reason it seems to escape you entirely that
any self-aware species that happened to emerge somewhere could argue the same thing. Why is this so difficult for you?