R&E will close on the 28th December - see this thread. https://www.religionethics.co.uk/index.php?topic=22932.0#new
Reading around further, I notice that David Pesetsky, an American linguist, has argued that Everett has left out a mass of contradictory data, in other words, examples of recursion in this language. If this is correct, it's a killer argument, but I am certainly not going to chase up all the details, as I am not being paid! Pesetsky's argument can be found in the comments here: http://www.chronicle.com/article/angry-words/131260And there is further stuff under the Wiki entry on Pesetsky, e.g. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000411