Author Topic: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election  (Read 503 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095

Well it is what they said they would do

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c93kkg37n3kt

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11158
  • God? She's black.
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2025, 11:41:41 AM »
Don't think it's a good idea: the lower the voting age, the more people not mature enough to vote sensibly will get the vote. I thought the same about lowering the age to 18, back in 1969, even though I benefitted: the voting age passed me going in the opposite direction, and I got the vote aged 18 and six months, in time to vote Labour in the 1970 general election ( they lost locally as well as nationally).
I OPPOSE GENOCIDE. I SUPPORT PALESTINE ACTION.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2025, 11:52:57 AM »
Don't think it's a good idea: the lower the voting age, the more people not mature enough to vote sensibly will get the vote. I thought the same about lowering the age to 18, back in 1969, even though I benefitted: the voting age passed me going in the opposite direction, and I got the vote aged 18 and six months, in time to vote Labour in the 1970 general election ( they lost locally as well as nationally).
having the same age for driving, drinking and voting makes sense to me but I can see why a more fluid age on voting makes sense in terms of encouraging participation. I haven't felt that the wider franchise in the Scottish elections has made that much difference.

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7744
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2025, 12:34:54 PM »
No taxation without representation.

I'm all for it.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11717
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2025, 03:43:24 PM »
I'm for it. For every dumb teenager you can find, I can find two elderly people who are equally stupid.
Hate the belief, love the believer.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33358
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2025, 05:12:17 PM »
I'm for it. For every dumb teenager you can find, I can find two elderly people who are equally stupid.
So you want to increase the number of dumb voters by 50%?

I think it's a terrible idea.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18716
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2025, 05:32:53 PM »
I wonder, in a GE context, as opposed to Holyrood elections here, if this will hit the Tories most in that, iirc, the general view is that younger votes are less likely to be Tory voters. Of course, I may be wrong.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095
« Last Edit: July 18, 2025, 07:12:15 AM by Nearly Sane »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2025, 02:00:27 PM »
.

Steve H

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11158
  • God? She's black.
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2025, 04:45:55 PM »
.
Beside the point. Of course there are stupid people at all ags, but the lower the voting age is, the mor e stupid (or rather, immature) voters there will be.
I OPPOSE GENOCIDE. I SUPPORT PALESTINE ACTION.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2025, 05:12:20 PM »
Beside the point. Of course there are stupid people at all ags, but the lower the voting age is, the mor e stupid (or rather, immature) voters there will be.
It was a joke, not an argument.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2025, 05:18:31 PM »
Elsewhere i saw it raised that the age you can get married in England and Wales was raised to 18 a couple of years ago. It's an odd difference if we then lower the voting age. Note in Scotland the marriage age is 16.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33358
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #13 on: July 18, 2025, 06:12:54 PM »
Beside the point. Of course there are stupid people at all ags, but the lower the voting age is, the mor e stupid (or rather, immature) voters there will be.

I doubt if sixteen year olds are any more or less stupid than the general population. The problem is that they are almost certainly less well informed and more ignorant of the issues and less experienced at life in general.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 66095
Re: 16 and 17-year-olds to be able to vote in next general election
« Reply #14 on: July 18, 2025, 06:42:23 PM »
I doubt if sixteen year olds are any more or less stupid than the general population. The problem is that they are almost certainly less well informed and more ignorant of the issues and less experienced at life in general.
Much more than 18 year olds? All of these things where we draw an arbitrary age line are about when we think it is reasonable for people to be given the responsibility even if we think that they may 'improve' with age. With voting there's an argument that if we get people involved younger it may improve their participation, and for they extra 2 years of their possible involvement, it has less specific impact than drinking, or driving. As Steve has noted, he felt the same about the reduction in voting age to 18 but I doubt any of us would seriously argue to put ot back to 21?