E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Recent Posts
Macroevolution" isn't a distinct process - it's just lots of "microevolution".Macroevolution is life forms becoming progressively more complex, which is what you claimed ("life evolved from simple beginnings ")
Actually I concur with NS on this one.Including him simply making stuff up - in other words making up odds, where they clearly don't exist.
Robbie,
Yes...Gregor Mendel and even Darwin, among many others, show that there was no conflict between Faith and science even among Christians. People thought of nature as God's creation and Science as a tool to unravel God's design and God's plans.
Why suddenly in the mid 20th Century such a big divide got created I wonder. It is not necessarily inevitable as many people here seem to think. Lot depends on the culture one grows up in, I think.
Cheers.
Sriram
What error?
'Can see Scotland getting knocked out in the group stage.'
'Likely loss to Ireland. And quite possible loss against the hosts in what looks like being a qualifier for the quarters in the last of all the group matches. Scotland not known as the best travellers.'
Are not comments that can reasonably be interpreted as anything other than you thinking Scotland going out at the group stages is a likely outcome, despite your later denial. I did not misinterpret what you wrote regardless of whether that is what you actually meant.
There again we don't or are ever likely to agree I see asking to remain or leave easy to understand you don't agree and it just seems to me you're side is doing more and more wriggling because your side didn't get its own way in as I see it a legitimately constructed choice, A or B if you like.
All of this you didn't do this, they should have done that or whatever is irrelevant to me, a pointless argument and any kind of reversal would be going against fundamental democratic principles as far as I'm concerned, leave won, I doubt we'll even agree on that.
We're all hard liners on this when it comes to it yours or my arguments are at an impasse and were at an impasse back in 16 therefore referendum.
All of the information I wanted about whether I wanted to be in or out of the EU was there many years ago and I never have wanted to be a part of the EU especially ever closer union just one, a big one, amongst loads of other reasons, leavers weren't sleepwalking over your cliff the BBC keeps on shouting out for you, we just take a view that differs from yours, none of us are idiots we're not going to be convinced by anything you say and visa versa the other way.
So I'll take it you don't want a Stuka Manual then.
Regards, ippy.
Let's all start to make a success of leaving.Your government doesn't have to spend billions mitigating the negative effects of something if will be a success.
Let's all start to make a success of leaving.
I've no intention to be drawn into any kind of endless equivalent of a musical rondo, we wont either of us side find a meeting point.
I also dread to think how we would be treated all over the world if we were seen to wimpishly have allowed ourselves to be cheated out of the leave decision, please sir Mr EU can we come back we didn't really mean it; no thanks.
There are so many reasons other than ever closer union that leaving the EU will resolve not much that there, if anything we'd agree about.
The referendum was democratic in my estimation something else we're never going to agree about.
