I think that one mans critical thinking is another mans scientism, no matter what one pleads.
What you wish to think is entirely up to you but as I am not into scientism, that isn't of any significance for me.
Why is God invisible in the physical sense?
I asked for evidence of God, not particularly its visibility.
Observation we are told affects the observed God is unchanging and is not observed.
Is this supposed to be two sentences? In which case, the second sentence is just a rather vague assertion
One might also ponder what something that is everywhere at anytime looks like to our eyes.
Again, I am asking for evidence for God, not what it looks like.
So much for physicality. But there are other ways of seeing....and avoiding seeing.
Or, alternatively, one can convince oneself that god is being 'seen' .... and avoiding that it is not being 'seen' at all. Your particular god is supposed to have come to earth in the human form of Jesus, so, so much for physicality indeed.
That is the purpose of philosophy and conscience.
As far as conscience goes, there is biological evidence that it resides in the brain and it may have evolved as a social survival mechanism. As far as philosophy is concerned, there are many different and often conflicting ideas about what god is or what god is not or even if there is a god.