However my point is a more general one about the haka - I've long thought it wrong that NZ get two motivational set pieces prior to a match, the national anthem and the haka, while other teams get just one. Seems fairer to me that NZ should have to choose which one they want, either the national anthem or the haka, but not both.
I was quite amused some years ago by an interview ahead of the Calcutta Cup, I don't recall which player it was with, where the interviewer was attempting to agitate some anti-English sentiment, and the player pointed out he wasn't upset at the anthems, it just meant there were two anthems that applied to him rather than simply the one, but that ultimately that didn't make the blindest bit of difference.
I'm also glad that we are much more accepting of a robust response to the haka (e.g. England, or turning back or simply continuing to lightly practice). The old approach where the opposition were obliged to simply stand respectfully and watch as NZ built themselves up for the start of the match was wrong.
I believe - although I'm prepared to be proven wrong - that you aren't permitted to turn your back or walk away from the Haka (or the Sipi Tau, or the others) or it's another offence that can be met with a fine.
And, to hear a Maori I used to play with, that sort of disrespect would rile them up more than meeting the Haka head on. I'm not sure that's wise
O.
